The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcer value (pp. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. New York: American Museum of Natural History. Fifty-second James Arthur lecture on the evolution of the human brain. Human brain evolution in an ecological context. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 157–164. The role of verbal behavior in human learning: Infant performance on fixed-interval schedules. Harzem (Eds.), Reinforcement and the organization of behavior (pp. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 53–67. Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experienced-based differences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 159–173. Self-control in adult humans: Variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay. Maintenance of self-control acquired through a fading procedure: Follow-up on Mazur and Logue (1978). Independence of reinforcer amount and delay: The generalized matching law and self-control in humans. Self-control and impulsiveness in preschool children. Self-control: Waiting until tomorrow for what you want today. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 11, 665–709. Research on self-control: An integrating framework. Dupré (Ed.), The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality (pp. Brain size and the evolution of mind: Fifty-ninth James Arthur lecture on the evolution of the human brain. Montagna (Eds.), Advances in primatology: Vol. Gross brain indices and the analysis of fossil endocasts. Quantitative analysis of the evolution of the brain in mammals. Scalae naturae: Why there is no theory in comparative psychology. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Self-control in adult humans: Comparison of qualitatively different reinforcers. Ohio Journal of Science, 40, 219–259.įorzano, L. A record of the body weight and certain organ and gland weights of 3,690 animals. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 46 (pt. Brain and body weight in man: Their antecedents in growth and evolution. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231–242.Ĭount, E. On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 21–36.īaum, W. Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496.Īlsop, B., & Elliffe, D. Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 485–489.Īinslie, G. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that species differences in self-control are related to the ratio of brain size to body weight (a possible indicator of general cognitive ability) or to shared phylogeny.Īinslie, G. These results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that species differences in self-control are a function of language ability or of specific types of prior training. Both experiments indicated that, in laboratory paradigms in which humans show self-control and pigeons and rats show impulsiveness, macaques show self-control. In Experiment 2, subjects exhibited significantly greater sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount than to variation in reinforcer delay in a procedure in which the reinforcer delay associated with the self-control alternative was adjusted until each macaque was indifferent between the two alternatives. In Experiment 1, subjects exhibited significant selfcontrol in a procedure in which reinforcer amounts and delays were held constant throughout a condition. Two experiments tested two cynomolgus monkeys’ self-control-choice of a longer, more delayed reinforcer over a shorter, less delayed reinforcer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |